Monitoringreport-FUMI-2019-Flippingbook_EN

Germany: 35 Austria: 1 France: 2 Denmark: 1 Netherlands: 5 Slovakia: 1 Italy: 4 IMPRINT Editor: QS Qualität und Sicherheit GmbH Dr. Hermann-Josef Nienhoff, Managing Director Schedestr. 1–3 GER-53113 Bonn Phone: +49 228 35068-0 Fax: +49 228 35068-10 E-Mail: info@q-s.de www.q-s.de Design: Susanne Del Din (del din design, Siegburg, Germany) Pictures: QS Qualität und Sicherheit GmbH, Shutterstock Based on: Analysis results of QS feed monitoring from April 2008 to June 2019 Status: September 2019 Monitoring- Report 2019 Feed What is the trend for the different parameters? Where should specific measures be taken to minimise inputs of undesirable substances? In order to support you in your daily work, we have again mapped the trend of 12 selected parameters. The three-year comparison shows: the levels of dioxins and dl PCBs, measured at 50 percent of the strictest limit value, fluctua- ted between the years 2016 and 2018, however, the level remains about the same. In contrast to the other heavy metals, cadmium was more frequently measured in 2018, but the values are lower than in previous years. The trend for lead and mercury is declining. ■ Parameters year-on-year ANALYSIS RESULTS OF UNDESIRABLE SUBSTANCES IN A THREE-YEAR COMPARISON 2016/2017/2018 Dioxins 4,455 87.21 % 4.50 % 4,642 90.41 % 4.62 % 4,234 86.35 % 4.18 % dl PCB 4,237 85.58 % 3.78 % 4,497 89.44 % 5.40 % 4,101 85.49 % 4.51 % Total dioxins and dl PCB 1,911 89.48 % 1.70 % 2,073 89.77 % 4.35 % 1,830 88.80 % 2.28 % ndl PCB 3,726 68.92 % 1.44 % 4,285 75.03 % 1.65 % 3,704 76.65 % 1.48 % Arsenic 5,856 31.75 % 21.30 % 6,341 30.83 % 20.87 % 5,607 31.50 % 20.89 % Lead 5,931 46.03 % 9.23 % 6,379 45.27 % 9.07 % 5,662 44.58 % 8.16 % Cadmium 5,933 64.92 % 4.67 % 6,378 65.27 % 4.28 % 5,656 67.36 % 4.02 % Mercury 5,858 7.34 % 11.86 % 6,341 7.00 % 11.26 % 5,600 6.93 % 8.51 % Salmonella** 10,114 0.07 % – 10,472 0.23 % – 9,739 0.18 % – AwS a ** 870 0.57 % – 970 0.62 % – 827 3.02 % – Pirimiphos- methyl b 4,651 13.24 % 99.84 % 4,974 10.55 % 100.00 % 4,593 11.06 % 100.00 % Chlorpyrifos- methyl b 4,651 3.23 % 63.33 % 4,974 2.92 % 67.59 % 4,593 2.66 % 54.92 % Parameter Number of analyses 2016 2017 2018 Trend **only positive/negative findings *Value above limit of detection/quantification Preparing for the audit – time is money Evidence of all analyses carried out for the feed monitoring in the QS database is one of the cen- tral audit criteria. In just a few steps you can pre- pare for it in the QS database. The following screenshots show you how you can compile your data in Excel format, for example, and how you can present the analyses to the auditor via further filter options. This saves you valuable time during the audit. ■ Number of analyses Number of analyses – – a = Antibiotic active substances b = Pesticides Trend: increasing ( ) , constant ( ) , declining ( ) 49 QS-approved laboratories from seven countries participated in this year's Laboratory Per- formance Assessment for Feed. The result underlines their expertise: all 49 laboratories suc- cessfully passed the assessment. 46 of the 49 laboratories even passed the test without any errors. The laboratories did not know neither the parameter to be tested, nor the sample material nor the exact date of shipment in advance. This year's task was to analyse two different samples for the heavy metals arsenic, lead, cadmium and mer- cury . As first sample material the laboratories received a complete feed for pigs, the second sample was a mineral feed. With the Laboratory Performance Assessment, QS tests the analytical quality of the labo- ratories once a year. In turn, this enables them to identify problems and sources of error and thus continuously improve the quality of their analyses. ■ Laboratory Performance Assessment 2019: Work of outstanding quality 3. NARROWING THE ANALYSIS RESULTS VIA FILTER OPTIONS Analysis results Search criteria Sample ID Status Type of sample Sampler Commissioned laboratory Country of origin feed Name of feed Laboratory's internal sample number Date of sampling from Date of sampling to Exceeding Sampling parameter 2. VIA THE MENU TO THE ANALYSIS RESULTS 4. DOWNLOAD THE EXCEL SPREADSHEET WITH THE BUTTON PARAMETER / FEED 1. LOGIN INTO THE QS DATABASE 5. OVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR THE AUDITOR DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPATING LABORATORIES IN EUROPE Value deter- mined* Values ≥ 50 % of strictest limit value Value deter- mined* Values ≥ 50 % of strictest limit value Values ≥ 50 % of strictest limit value Value deter- mined* Value deter- mined* Values ≥ 50 % of strictest limit value